애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문가족법연구2017.07 발행KCI 피인용 3

수익자연속신탁과 Dead Hand Rule

Successive Beneficiary Trust and Dead Hand Rule

김현진(인하대학교)

31권 2호, 63~98쪽

초록

The purpose of this paper is to propose imposing a time limit on the reach of the dead hand in Successive Beneficiary Trust. The trust with Successive Beneficiaries is defined a trust that a beneficiary acquires the right of a previous beneficiary, when the previous beneficiary met his death. At issue here is that Korean Trust Act does not limit trust duration for Successive beneficiary trust, and therefore it seems to allow for a perpetual trust. This paper covers the common law Rule Against Perpetuities (RAP); its history, underlying policies and the modern debates over reforming the Rule. RAP requires all interests to vest or fail within the lives of one who could possibly have been known to the donor plus twenty-one years. Property cannot be subjected to contingencies for longer than the perpetuities period. In this way, the Rule imposes a time limit on the reach of the dead hand. However, today every state in US has reformed the Rule, honoring the Rule’s basic purpose. As a consequence of GST (generation-skipping transfer) tax and a lifetime exemption, as well as the competition for trust business, more than half the states in US have abrogated the Rule for a perpetual trust. However, there are still debates over the Rule and we can easily figure out the social side effect of allowing a perpetual trust. With such understanding of the features to exercise dead hand control through the Rule, we can argue the necessities of imposing time limit on Successive beneficiary trust, and propose the possible period.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to propose imposing a time limit on the reach of the dead hand in Successive Beneficiary Trust. The trust with Successive Beneficiaries is defined a trust that a beneficiary acquires the right of a previous beneficiary, when the previous beneficiary met his death. At issue here is that Korean Trust Act does not limit trust duration for Successive beneficiary trust, and therefore it seems to allow for a perpetual trust. This paper covers the common law Rule Against Perpetuities (RAP); its history, underlying policies and the modern debates over reforming the Rule. RAP requires all interests to vest or fail within the lives of one who could possibly have been known to the donor plus twenty-one years. Property cannot be subjected to contingencies for longer than the perpetuities period. In this way, the Rule imposes a time limit on the reach of the dead hand. However, today every state in US has reformed the Rule, honoring the Rule’s basic purpose. As a consequence of GST (generation-skipping transfer) tax and a lifetime exemption, as well as the competition for trust business, more than half the states in US have abrogated the Rule for a perpetual trust. However, there are still debates over the Rule and we can easily figure out the social side effect of allowing a perpetual trust. With such understanding of the features to exercise dead hand control through the Rule, we can argue the necessities of imposing time limit on Successive beneficiary trust, and propose the possible period.

발행기관:
한국가족법학회
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.31998/KSFL.2017.31.2.63
분류:
법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작