애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문노동법포럼2017.07 발행KCI 피인용 2

출퇴근재해 관련 헌법불합치 결정과 입법개선 방안 검토

The Study on the unconstitutionality decision of the commuting accident of Constitutional Court and legislative improvement

박종희(고려대학교)

21호, 193~225쪽

초록

According to the Industrial accident compensation insurance act, the commuting accident occurs while he/she commutes to or from work using a transportation means provided by his/her business owner or other similar means under the control and management of his/her business owner. However, The Constitutional Court recently ruled on the unconstitutionality of the article concerned. The Constitutional Court determined that the compensation for a general commuting accident is possible, the determination is a reasonable. It is rational conclusion, because it should be considered the aspect of social insurance rather than the aspect of liability insurance. In addition, it is true of forward-looking views of industrial accident compensation insurance. The Constitutional Court determined the unconstitutionality that discrimination between benefit worker and non-benefit worker and presented additional opinion that a strict criteria should be applied, even if social security benefit rights. The Constitutional Court also conclude that the commuting accident should be included in the application, be indistinguishable from typical accident on duty. Therefore, the legislature can progress legislative work late in a way to include the commuting accident in typical type of accident on duty or different type. This paper reviewed the main contents of legislation bills from the whole point of view. As a result, they are reasonable in terms of The Constitutional Court’s decision and future-oriented perspective. However, the contents of enforcement decree that allows the exception should be justified according to the point of view of the a strict criteria of review.

Abstract

According to the Industrial accident compensation insurance act, the commuting accident occurs while he/she commutes to or from work using a transportation means provided by his/her business owner or other similar means under the control and management of his/her business owner. However, The Constitutional Court recently ruled on the unconstitutionality of the article concerned. The Constitutional Court determined that the compensation for a general commuting accident is possible, the determination is a reasonable. It is rational conclusion, because it should be considered the aspect of social insurance rather than the aspect of liability insurance. In addition, it is true of forward-looking views of industrial accident compensation insurance. The Constitutional Court determined the unconstitutionality that discrimination between benefit worker and non-benefit worker and presented additional opinion that a strict criteria should be applied, even if social security benefit rights. The Constitutional Court also conclude that the commuting accident should be included in the application, be indistinguishable from typical accident on duty. Therefore, the legislature can progress legislative work late in a way to include the commuting accident in typical type of accident on duty or different type. This paper reviewed the main contents of legislation bills from the whole point of view. As a result, they are reasonable in terms of The Constitutional Court’s decision and future-oriented perspective. However, the contents of enforcement decree that allows the exception should be justified according to the point of view of the a strict criteria of review.

발행기관:
노동법이론실무학회
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.46329/LLF.2017.07.21.193
분류:
법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
출퇴근재해 관련 헌법불합치 결정과 입법개선 방안 검토 | 노동법포럼 2017 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI