판결문 공개시 비실명화작업에 대한 국가배상책임

These days the public impassionedly demands for opening decision. Accordingly the Supreme court would be ready to open decision through such a work. By means of software system, being prepared with sincerity, it will raise doubts whether it will be perfectly ready for it or not. Nothing in this world is perfect. There are actually two decisions which one is to accept plaintiff's claim, the other is not owing to defendant's torts. It mean it will occur to this issue at all times. And if opening decision accomplished, the lawsuit the plaintiff demand compensation will dramatically increase. To Judge on acknowledgement to compensate, it needs occurrence of damage. Second it's whether defendant' fault is or not. The test is that there is duty to protect victim' self-determination or not. On the base of law and bylaw, it is fully to admit to get a duty. Meanwhile in case related public servant's act looks like country's act, Is that possible to hold country's responsibility on State Compensation Act. Demanding for gross negligence, it's not possible that it is very hard to admit gross negligence. Nevertheless the recent decision it accept plaintiff's damage is enormously meaningful and the its conclusion helps country more carefully make open decision's works.