전문가판단을 활용한 신상품 수요예측 모형: 소비자를 대상으로 한 방법과의 비교
A New Product Forecasting Model based on the Expert Judgment : A Comparison with the model based on Consumer data
최정희(숭실대학교); 이상진(숭실대학교); 최영환(숭실대학교); 응웬띠민지(숭실대학교); 김근배(숭실대학교)
30권 9호, 1631~1652쪽
초록
마케팅에서 신상품의 매출을 예측하는 것은 매우 중요하다. 본 연구에서는 국내 TV홈쇼핑에서 취급하는98개 신상품 매출자료로 수요예측 모형을 만들었다. TV홈쇼핑은 실시간으로 제품을 판매하기 때문에즉각적으로 매출 자료를 파악할 수 있다. 더욱이 일반 유통인 경우에는 특정 제품의 매출 자료에 타 경쟁제품의마케팅 활동에 따른 교란요인들이 포함되어 있지만, 홈쇼핑에서 얻은 매출 자료는 상대적으로 그러한교란요인이 적어 수요예측 모형을 만들기에 적합하다. 본 연구에서는 신상품 출시 전, 동일한 신제품을다수의(500-600여명) 소비자가 신제품에 대한 구매의향을 평가한 자료와 10명의 사내 전문가가 성공 가능성을평가한 자료를 사용하여 출시 이후에 실제 매출 자료를 연결시켜 수요예측 모형을 만들었다. 본 연구에서는 홈쇼핑의 신상품 실제 매출 자료를 종속변수로 사용하고 출시 전, 소비자 평가 자료와전문가판단 자료를 독립변수로 사용하여 2개의 신제품 수요예측모형을 만들었다. 그리고 이 수요예측모형으로 소비자 평가 자료와 전문가 판단자료 간 예측력을 비교하였다. 본 분석결과 컨셉테스트와 같은소비자평가 자료를 사용한 수요예측모형은 예측력에 있어 전문가 판단자료를 사용한 것보다 나았지만, 예측력에서 큰 차이를 보이지 않았다. 즉 소비자 평가 자료로 얻은 수요예측 모형의 예측력은 전문가 판단자료와 비교하여 상대적으로 크지 않는 것으로 조사되었다. 컨셉테스트 같은 다수의 소비자를 대상으로 한평가 자료는 예측력이 다소 높지만, 시간과 비용이 많이 들고 신제품 정보를 외부에 노출시킨다는 점을고려해보면 소수의 사내 전문가 판단 자료를 사용하는 것에 비해 큰 장점이 없다. 소수의 사내 전문가를활용하면 외부의 정보노출 우려도 불식할 수 있고 시간과 비용 면에서 효율적이라 할 수 있다. 따라서 다수의소비자를 대상으로 신제품 수용도 조사(이를테면 컨셉테스트)를 실행하기 어려운 상황에서는 대안으로 소수의전문가 조사를 실시하여 출시 가능 여부의 결정을 고려할 수 있다.
Abstract
Forecasting the sales of new product was very important issue in marketing. Because of the success percent was not high. it was the scholarly common opinion the failure of new product about 80-90 percent. And now, it is consistent and important issues of marketing research(section). Generally speaking, making the predictive model about the established product can explain to find the other variables related to the current research variable. But forecasting the new product was difficult to explain it because there was not the previously sales data set. this study had the main aim to check the predictive force about concept test. Additionally, the other method of new product's success or failure could use the expert evaluation method. Therefore, throughout expert evaluation and consumer's concept test were crucial to predict the new product success or not. Distribution industry marketer was also important to invent new product. but it was very different from the manufacturing section in itself. Owing to the unique distribution section was previously get the manufacturing goods quality and selected the best item among the gathering merchandise. In other words. distribution or channel's strategy was so passive compared to manufacturing section. TV homeshopping channel was the first and foremost section of distribution industry. there were a variety of characteristics on the TV homeshopping channel. We must know these nature and trait. The first, it is selling the real time and then gets the rapid feedback to sales of goods. the second, And there was no competitive factors(for example, rival company’s promotional activities and advertising, seasonal marketing etc.) compared to the traditional distribution channels. the third, it cost so high managing the market survey. and there were so many kinds of homeshopping goods. it was no more time to review and check the market and consumer data. Like this situation, you had better adapt the method of expert method. and the typical expert method was the in-house experts. And other expert methods were the subjective estimation, using the analogy, consumer-based date etc. Subjective estimation was applying to the function, demand of the new product before launching of new product. This method was treated as collecting the data related to technician and engineer, marketer, other field experts. and its methods included Delphi method, Analytic Hierarchy Process, MIT(Management Judgment Test). The second method was using the analogy technique. It analyzed the similar product category which we must investigate the present, new product without the previous data. And its method was compared with the serial data considering the developing pattern or special situation of past sales record. The third method was the consumer-based data. Using the method, we found the correlation between product sales volume and the preference of consumer before launching the product. and if test market was, it predicted the demand of the real sales volumes connecting to previous test market data. We used the input data of this model based on the purchasing intention of concept test and evaluation of in-house experts. Concept test means the technique and skill related to linguistics and pictures, use situation. Additionally, we utilized the method measuring the judgement of expert. If launching the new product, it was essential to test the new product, do the campaign. The typical expert method was the MJT(Management Judgment Test). MJT's method completed before screening the final concept of new product. Compared to other research tools, it could execute the low cost. When doing the MJT, Various experts must evaluate separately, could not brainstorm one another before publishing the result of the final product evaluation. In generally, MJT method was apply to the convey the advertising or new product concept. We were asking the purchasing intention to consumer opinion of new product by online survey. and then combined to real sales data after finishing TV Homeshopping broadcasting. And then we were asking 10 -house experts combined the successful possibility of new product. First of all, we must be very careful of this viewpoint. these data was not individual level but aggregation level. In this study, we made the forecasting model based on the sales of 98 products sold on the Korea TV home shopping channel. It was possible to check its real time sales volume on home shopping channel. We developed two models based on 500-600 consumer’s data(concept test). And the same product volume(8 products sold on the Korea TV home shopping channel), Forecasting accuracy of the sales response model from consumer data versus from management judgment was compared. It was found that the consumer-based forecasting model was more accurate than the judgment-based but the difference was not too big. In general, consumer based-method cost too much and took long survey hours. If you utilize the small number of in-house experts, there will be so many advantages in cost and time. Further the sensitive information such new product development would be kept inside the company. It could be an alternative method in case the consumer data is not feasible because judgment-based method was more cost-efficient and time-saving method
- 발행기관:
- 대한경영학회
- 분류:
- 경영학