자본시장법상 운용제한과 그 유예규정의 해석에 관한 소고 - 제81조 동일종목 10% 한도의 유예규정을 중심으로 -

Han, Junghwan, the author of this thesis, is currently while in the master's course in department of finance law in graduate school of legal affairs in Korea University and works as Chief Compliance Officer at Macquarie Investment Management Korea Co., Ltd. ‘Financial Investment Services and Capital Market Act’(hereafter "FSCMA") and its subsidiary regulations have various rules on investment restriction in order to ensure to comply with diversified investment in fund management. Although diversified investment is very important principle in reducing investment risk in fund management, fund managers sometimes cannot help breaching investment limits due to unavoidable situations out of his or her control(i.e. increase in the price of holding securities). If we formally treat this case as the breach of the limit and simply apply legal effect without considering circumstances, it may constrict fund management unreasonably. Therefore, the need of reasonable interpretation on the breach of investment limits is brought up between the need of diversified investment of the fund and the secure of discretion in fund management. Firstly, we will take a general view of the rules to secure diversified investment under FSCMA, review grace period rules of single issuer 10% rule which would be the core of the rules of diversified investments and conflicting opinions about the interpretation of grace period rules and finally would like to present opinion.