正祖時代 ‘復讐殺人’의 양상과 그 의미 : 『추관지』 復讐殺人 판례를 중심으로

This paper scrutinizes the aspect of 'murder' in the period of Jeongjo era and its response to the adjustment through the legal clause and the case record of the revenge murders of the late Joseon period as a preliminary consideration in order to capture the change of consciousness about revenge First, in the law book of the late Joseon Dynasty, it not only increases related clauses but also more acceptances of Revenge murders than the former law book called 『Dae-Myung-Ryul』. Since specific provisions such as enlargement of revenge subjects, concrete presentation of revenge situations, and prohibition of revenge for events accused in the court are increased This reflects the numerous revenge murder cases of the late Joseon Dynasty, and at the same time provides a new basis for judging revenge murder cases in this period. Next, in the book of 『Chu-gwan-Ji』, revenge incidents appear in a new aspect, such as revenge cases involving ambiguity of purpose of revenge or involving women compared to the past. The response of this adjustment reveals that the eyes of the King Jeongjo and the bureaucrats in charge are different from each other. In other words, the King Jeongjo, in the verdict of the revenge murder, operates the narrative to 'make a person who realizes Confucian values. Its working principle is to repeatedly emphasize and emphasize the formation of sympathy through the insertion of revenge subjects' idioms and the designation of the conclusion of 'submission to state authority after revenge' (turn oneself in). On the other hand, bureaucrats have expressed concern about the confusion of social order due to the inconsistent application of law and emphasized that objectivity and fairness should be maintained in revenge.