스위스 형사사법개혁 취지를 통해 살펴본 한국의 검찰개혁

The current administration needs to reform the prosecution. However, it is inappropriate for the government to set a deadline for the prosecution reform. The government stresses the importance of the reform, which requires reforming the prosecution in the overall judiciary reform process. And the government is pushing for reforming the prosecution, as it is the only right way to adjust the investigative authority between the prosecution and the police and install the criminal investigative service against corrupt public officials. However, it is necessary for the government to reconsider whether the government's reform plan is solely for citizens. In this paper, we reviewed the judicial reform of Switzerland and reviewed its implications. As a result, it is problematic for the government to set the deadline for the reform and push for the reform in a way that the government wants. Therefore, instead of deciding the deadline, it is necessary to seek a wider range of reforms - the actual independence and control of the prosecution, the power distribution of the prosecution through the establishment of the criminal investigative service, the establishment of prosecutors’ council, and the restoration of the prosecution’s quasi-judicial function. The ‘deep-rooted evil ' in the criminal justice system that the government claims to be scrapped should be abolished. However, it should not proceed with political purposes in mind but should pursue the interests of the citizens.