“专利盒税制”(Patent Box Regime)对中国的借鉴
A Comparative Review for Renovation of the Patent Box Regime in China
김연(성균관대학교 법학전문대학원 학술연구박사과정 수료)
33권 3호, 135~207쪽
초록
技术从研发到其利益的实现需要一个漫长的过程,为了使研发活动得到持续的进行,各国政府都选择从税收政策着手试图减轻整个过程中产生的税负,但大多的政策都是针对研发的投入阶段而制定的。在认识到技术只有实现其经济利益时一国的科技实力才能得到增强后,一些国家的促进性税收政策又开始转向技术的商品化,这就是欧洲多国正在实行的专利盒税制。专利盒税制虽然在知识产权的转化方面取得了一定效果,但各国为吸引无形资产流入本国竞相降低专利盒税制的相关标准,进而引发了利用该税制进行避税的现象。为此,OECD在制定BEPS最终报告的时候,虽没有把专利盒税制列为有害的税收实践行为,但对该制度提出了相关的改善要求,即在遵守实质性活动标准的前提下利用关联法的计算方式来更准确的计算出可享受优惠税制的收入。 中国研究开发激励税制中的技术转让所得优惠税制虽与专利盒税制有着相似的政策性原理,但在具体的准许条件上还是有着一定的差距的。作为BEPS的参与国在最终落实相应标准的过程中,要按照中国具体的国情循序渐进的对现有的制度进行改善。为此,本稿先会对已有的研究开发激励税制简单的进行介绍,然后与之进行比较后对专利盒税制的基本原理、构成及在已实行的国家中产生的问题进行详细的叙述;要想借鉴专利盒税制就需对现行的状况有深度的了解,所以在之后的部分中,挑取了英国、荷兰、比利时等具有代表性国家的专利税制的具体实施内容并进行了仔细的阐述,以此作为中国技术转让所得优惠税制改善的事实性的依据。然后对中国现行的技术转让所得优惠税制、高新技术企业税收优惠制度和研究开发费用税前加计扣除政策等研究开发激励税制进行概括介绍后比较分析技术转让所得优惠税制与专利盒税制的不同点。最后会根据欧洲国家的现行内容和BEPS最终报告的要求对中国相关制度提出改善方案。
Abstract
This paper focuses on the Chinese Patent Box Regime. The Patent Box Regime is the preferential tax scheme for royalties or capital gains from intellectual properties which R&D performances make. In China, the government has made some legislative progress for supporting national corporations to do R&D work sufficiently and effectively. The Chinese Patent Box Regime includes tax preferential content to apply the special rate for transferring their intellectual properties such as capital gain from the IPs. It means that the tax regime chooses a little different route than other countries which operate the Patent Box Regime to apply this scheme for royalties and capital gains from the IPs. The Patent Box Regime brings about a side effect that people usually know, tax avoidance. According to this side effect, the global society comes out to take some action for abusing the Patent Box Regime. It shapes up as the primary part of BEPS Action 5. But it doesn't mean that the Patent Box Regime genuinely be made for tax avoidance. This paper makes a little solution to make up for weakness of the Patent Box Regime. Chapter 2 explains the reason why the Patent Box Regime comes into the picture. In existing R&D tax schemes, it focuses on R&D costs and the front-end of R&D process. First of all, companies make sufficient R&Ds for our society, but these companies lack R&D money. However, the Patent Box Regime focuses on the diametrical position where it concentrates on the back-end of R&D process. Following this manner, the Original Patent Box Regime could measure the social effect from the IPs. The Patent Box Regime designates commercial success of the IPs such as royalties or capital gains from the IPs as a proxy of the positive social effect. Chapter 2 also examines the calculation method for taxation technically, and considers legislative examples of other countries (including OECD/G20 Actions) to choose and operate the Patent Box Regime: U.K., the Netherlands, France, Ireland, and Belgium. Chapter 3 is an overview of the Chinese R&D tax system, including the Chinese Patent Box Regime. The Chinese government currently operates diverse tax preferential schemes for supporting R&D: deduction for R&D costs, the tax credit system for R&D, and the tax preferential scheme for innovative technology companies designated by the government. This paper explores these tax systems’ features briefly. Chapter 4 suggests personal opinions to make up for supporting and operating the Chinese Patent Box Regime desirably. First of all, the Chinese system extends the scope of the qualified taxpayer to include PEs in China. The qualified income and asset of the Chinese Patent Box Regime could also be needed to support R&D results and adjust practical problems. It would expand the qualified IPs to allow acquired IPs from the 3rd parties. In addition to expanding the qualified IPs, applying the Patent Box Regime to the following income could be needed to increase the social effect of this tax preferential regime: short-term (under 5 years) licensing fee and embedded royalties, etc. Finally, the current Chinese Patent Box Regime needs consolidation work to compile the administrative regulation for the regime such as the U.K. example.
- 발행기관:
- 한국국제조세협회
- 분류:
- 법학