워터파크 업체의 개인정보동의서와 면책 약관의 임의 통합 행위에 대한 법률적 접근
Legal Approach on A Unification Action of The Agreements of Personal Information Collection and Exception Clauses
정태린(공주대학교); 권재윤(상명대학교); 권관배(용인대학교)
26권 5호, 745~757쪽
초록
Purchasing tickets for water park is defined as an contract or an agreement was made between a water sports consumer and water sports supplier. With this reason, the process which gather the opinions of consumers or agreement is the most important for this business. However, a current issue what a water park supplier collected personal information agreement and exception clauses in a paper without any notices was discovered and just become a controversy in legal. Therefore, any preventive policies or countermeasures was not existed become another noisy controversy. This research was aimed to approach the tort case of the water park case and micro analyse it in the view of Korean Law, Constitutions, Criminal Law, Civil Law and The Act on Fair Indication and Advertisement of Korea. The results were as follows; First, the actions of water park and consumer is defined as an utilization contract. Second, the duty to notify of water park must be easy to approach and understand to customers, but the actions of the case was not. Third, the actions for the exception clauses of the water park is not to acknowledge the effect legally. Lastly, the customers could demand compensation for the injury for the tort of obligations regards duty to notify, liability for explanation and exception clauses. End of the paper, several discussions were suggested for follow up studies.
Abstract
Purchasing tickets for water park is defined as an contract or an agreement was made between a water sports consumer and water sports supplier. With this reason, the process which gather the opinions of consumers or agreement is the most important for this business. However, a current issue what a water park supplier collected personal information agreement and exception clauses in a paper without any notices was discovered and just become a controversy in legal. Therefore, any preventive policies or countermeasures was not existed become another noisy controversy. This research was aimed to approach the tort case of the water park case and micro analyse it in the view of Korean Law, Constitutions, Criminal Law, Civil Law and The Act on Fair Indication and Advertisement of Korea. The results were as follows; First, the actions of water park and consumer is defined as an utilization contract. Second, the duty to notify of water park must be easy to approach and understand to customers, but the actions of the case was not. Third, the actions for the exception clauses of the water park is not to acknowledge the effect legally. Lastly, the customers could demand compensation for the injury for the tort of obligations regards duty to notify, liability for explanation and exception clauses. End of the paper, several discussions were suggested for follow up studies.
- 발행기관:
- 한국체육과학회
- 분류:
- 체육