애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문무역연구2017.12 발행

A Comparative Study on Obligations of the Franchisor and the Franchisee Regarding Trademarks under Korea and USA Law

A Comparative Study on Obligations of the Franchisor and the Franchisee Regarding Trademarks under Korea and USA Law

민주희(계명대학교)

13권 6호, 19~37쪽

초록

As trademarks are essential to the running of the franchise business, issues regarding the trademarks would be the fundamental consideration for the contracting parties. This study discusses obligations of the franchisor and the franchisee regarding trademarks under Korea and USA laws. Legal questions concerning trademarks are identified, and solutions which the contracting parties should take into account are suggested. Firstly, the franchisor should have trademark rights or the right to license to use a trademark. And the franchisor must take control to maintain the value of its trademark and to prevent misleading use of its trademark by the franchisee. But as the extent of control is not provided under Korea and USA laws, the adequate control clause should be included in the franchise agreement. Secondly, for preventing the public confusion or deception, the franchisee is required to adequately use a trademark. Moreover once the infringement of a trademark arises, the franchisee shall inform the franchisor of infringement of trademark rights. This duty is helpful to appropriately deal with infringement of a trademark.

Abstract

As trademarks are essential to the running of the franchise business, issues regarding the trademarks would be the fundamental consideration for the contracting parties. This study discusses obligations of the franchisor and the franchisee regarding trademarks under Korea and USA laws. Legal questions concerning trademarks are identified, and solutions which the contracting parties should take into account are suggested. Firstly, the franchisor should have trademark rights or the right to license to use a trademark. And the franchisor must take control to maintain the value of its trademark and to prevent misleading use of its trademark by the franchisee. But as the extent of control is not provided under Korea and USA laws, the adequate control clause should be included in the franchise agreement. Secondly, for preventing the public confusion or deception, the franchisee is required to adequately use a trademark. Moreover once the infringement of a trademark arises, the franchisee shall inform the franchisor of infringement of trademark rights. This duty is helpful to appropriately deal with infringement of a trademark.

발행기관:
한국무역연구원
분류:
무역학일반

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
A Comparative Study on Obligations of the Franchisor and the Franchisee Regarding Trademarks under Korea and USA Law | 무역연구 2017 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI