보건의료 연구개발사업 유형별 경제성평가항목 우선순위 도출 연구
Developing and Evaluating Assessment Indicator on National Healthcare R&D Project
민희은(식품의약품안전청); 김응도(충북대학교); 배기수(충북대학교); 정선미(한국보건산업진흥원); 강길원(충북대학교)
34권 4호, 139~151쪽
초록
This study was conducted to draw prioritized indicators which are applicable to decide priority order in the assessment process of budget allocation for the healthcare R&D project. We set up the hierarchy based on the review of previous researches and the prioritized assessment indicators, and conducted a survey to experts in Healthcare-related government agencies, academia, research and industry. The results are derived, using the method of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). When no specific research type is suggested, “Necessity of the research” is chosen with the highest proportion (57.0%). In the case of basic research and policy research, “importance of policy direction” is highly chosen (51.2%) with the response of “Necessity of the research” (61.7%). However, “Economic feasibility” is critically recognized (51.5%) in case of the high technology research, indicating that the response to expected effect may be different depending on research type.
Abstract
This study was conducted to draw prioritized indicators which are applicable to decide priority order in the assessment process of budget allocation for the healthcare R&D project. We set up the hierarchy based on the review of previous researches and the prioritized assessment indicators, and conducted a survey to experts in Healthcare-related government agencies, academia, research and industry. The results are derived, using the method of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). When no specific research type is suggested, “Necessity of the research” is chosen with the highest proportion (57.0%). In the case of basic research and policy research, “importance of policy direction” is highly chosen (51.2%) with the response of “Necessity of the research” (61.7%). However, “Economic feasibility” is critically recognized (51.5%) in case of the high technology research, indicating that the response to expected effect may be different depending on research type.
- 발행기관:
- 한국경영과학회
- 분류:
- 경영학