등록디자인 도면에서의 파선의 해석 -유럽연합의 등록공동체디자인 사례를 중심으로-

As regards the using of broken lines, the following points can be figured out by studying a few cases related to RCD in EU. First, the most general meaning of broken lines, which were used in a drawing of registered design, is to indicate that the part is not claimed as a right. Second, the broken lines may be used to express a design feature itself like sewing or folded line. Third, it is not desirable to use broken lines in order to show any invisible shapes. Fourth, in EU, the broken lines can be used to express transparency. However, in Korea and the U.S., transparency is generally expressed with thin lines. Fifth, the broken lines may be used to show any purpose and function of products. Sixth, regarding whether it is possible to express any optional features of design by using broken lines, this was denied in the EU’s cases, but it could be possible in our partial design system. Seventh, when using broken lines in EU, the meaning of those need to be consistent. However it is possible to use broken lines with different purpose in our practice. Finally, when considering the practice of broken lines in the examination guidelines of EU and the U.S., it is needed to establish more positive and detailed guidelines of examination about using broken lines in KIPO.