애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문신뢰성 응용연구2018.06 발행KCI 피인용 1

정비대체장비(M/F) 소요산출 방법비교 및 검증방안 연구

Comparison and Validation Plan for the Calculation Method of Required Maintenance Float (M/F)

이학재(LIG넥스원); 김재황(LIG넥스원); 정재우(LIG넥스원); 서무경(LIG넥스원); 권기상(LIG넥스원)

18권 2호, 143~152쪽

초록

Purpose: In this paper, we propose calculation methods of Maintenance Float (M/F). Results of each method are compared and verified by using commercial tool (OPUS Suite). As modern weapon systems become more expensive, we need to find the most economical and efficient method to achieve the target operational availability (Ao). Methods: Three kinds of methods (Considering the number of CSP, Applying the Poisson distribution, and Applying M&S Tool) are used to find the number of M/F. Three methods (Considering the number of CSP, Applying the Poisson distribution, and Applying M&S Tool) were used to estimate the required number of M/F. The analysis results were verified by SIMLOX. The cost of equipment calculated by each analysis method was compared and the cause of the difference was analyzed. Conclusion: Ao and cost must be considered to find the optimal number of M/F. In general, it costs more to increase availability. But the cost is not necessarily proportional to Ao. Therefore, it is better to compare the calculation method and determine the final MF quantity.

Abstract

Purpose: In this paper, we propose calculation methods of Maintenance Float (M/F). Results of each method are compared and verified by using commercial tool (OPUS Suite). As modern weapon systems become more expensive, we need to find the most economical and efficient method to achieve the target operational availability (Ao). Methods: Three kinds of methods (Considering the number of CSP, Applying the Poisson distribution, and Applying M&S Tool) are used to find the number of M/F. Three methods (Considering the number of CSP, Applying the Poisson distribution, and Applying M&S Tool) were used to estimate the required number of M/F. The analysis results were verified by SIMLOX. The cost of equipment calculated by each analysis method was compared and the cause of the difference was analyzed. Conclusion: Ao and cost must be considered to find the optimal number of M/F. In general, it costs more to increase availability. But the cost is not necessarily proportional to Ao. Therefore, it is better to compare the calculation method and determine the final MF quantity.

발행기관:
한국신뢰성학회
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.33162/JAR.2018.06.18.2.143
분류:
신뢰성이론

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
정비대체장비(M/F) 소요산출 방법비교 및 검증방안 연구 | 신뢰성 응용연구 2018 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI