정책결정과 정책집행 간의 시차에 관한 연구 - 제19대 국회 법률 및 관련 시행령의 분석을 중심으로 -

The main purpose of this study is to suggest important implications to reduce and overcome time lag by investigating empirically the occurrence of some degree of time lag and finding the causes of time lag in the policy making and policy implementation stages. This study confirmed a time lag targeted on laws and enforcement ordinances of the 19th National Assembly, using three dimensions for analysis: proposer of the bill, characteristics of the bill, and environmental factors. The main research results are as follows. First, time lag did not show a big difference according to proposer of the bill, interdepartmental factors, whether the bill involves a budget, or policy target group factors. But there were big time lags according to committee remits and policy types. Among committees, time lag between laws and enforcement ordinances took the longest in the environment and labor committee･health and welfare committee･women and family committee with a mean of 323 days. With regard to policy types, regulatory policy took the longest time with a mean of 278 days and distributive policy took 221 days and constituent policy took 202 days on average. Second, factors influencing the time lag between laws and enforcement ordinances were two factors namely committee and regulatory policy. In other words, the enactment laws of environment and labor･health and welfare･women and family committee took more time than the enactment laws of trade and Industry･future creation science･broadcasting and communications committee. And it is found that regulation policy took more time lag than constituent policy. On the basis of this analysis’results, this paper examines ways to reduce time lag in policy making and policy implementation and suggests policy implications.