동성혼인에 대한 자유주의이론에 관한 논의

Same-sex relationships, which have long been banned in the United States, aresubject to criminal punishment and religious taboo. Nonetheless, Same-sex relationshipshave existed and formed part of many societies, and continue to exist today so thatthere are many people who live together even though their relationship is not legallyrecognized throughout the term of their lives. The fact that many modern British and American philosophers including JohnRawls, and Ronald Dworkin have expressed their views on homosexuality demonstratesthat the issue is still a controversial one for some segments of societyIn the case of Obergefell v. Hodges in 2015, the Supreme Court of the UnitedStates does not explicitly discuss prominent liberal theories, but reflected them. Regarding trends since 2015, Carlos A. Ball has published a book that offers manyviews on homosexuality. Among them, the most impressive view was that we shouldrespect and care for the minority with this ruling. In Korea, the legal debate on homosexuality has not been as fiercely contested asit has been in the West, but it exists, at least indirectly, and may someday becomethe center of legal debate. Beyond this debate, if we can raise the motivation toarrange legal supplementary measures that look after the interests of minority groups,and get people to properly explore the reasons that they think that same-sexrelationships and marriages are controversial, discussions on this subject can becomemore meaningful.