애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문ASIAN JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION2017.10 발행

Characterizing R&D and HRD in the innovation process of Japanese SMEs: analysis based on field study

Characterizing R&D and HRD in the innovation process of Japanese SMEs: analysis based on field study

Masatsugu Tsuji(Kobe International University); Hidenori Shigeno(Kobe International University); Yasushi Ueki(ERIA); Hiroki Idota(Kindai University); Teruyuki Bunno(Kindai University)

25권 2호, 367~385쪽

초록

To analyse the nature of R&D and HRD among Japanese SMEs, theJapan Team selected the following three firms from themanufacturing industry, depending upon size in terms of thenumber of employees, types of products, orientation towardinnovation and so on. The three firms selected were Dynic, KyokkoElectrics (Kyokko for short) and Maeda Precision Manufacturing(Maeda for short). In the context of formal or informal R&D, Dynicand Kyokko own R&D centres, while Maeda does not, which is dueto the size of firms. This study analyses their R&D and HRDorganizational structures and implementations and identifies factorswhich determine the nature of their R&D and HRD. The factorspromoting innovation extracted based on the in-depth interviewsare (1) the size of firm, (2) types of product and production, (3)seeds of innovation, (4) attitude toward risk and (5) learningprocess. The common factor acting as the basis for the firms’ R&Dstructure was identified as ISO9001 which three firms commonlyintroduced and applied. Their HRD are also different, which are dueto (1) level of new employees and (2) the size of firm. The policyimplications for further promotion of innovation are also discussed.

Abstract

To analyse the nature of R&D and HRD among Japanese SMEs, theJapan Team selected the following three firms from themanufacturing industry, depending upon size in terms of thenumber of employees, types of products, orientation towardinnovation and so on. The three firms selected were Dynic, KyokkoElectrics (Kyokko for short) and Maeda Precision Manufacturing(Maeda for short). In the context of formal or informal R&D, Dynicand Kyokko own R&D centres, while Maeda does not, which is dueto the size of firms. This study analyses their R&D and HRDorganizational structures and implementations and identifies factorswhich determine the nature of their R&D and HRD. The factorspromoting innovation extracted based on the in-depth interviewsare (1) the size of firm, (2) types of product and production, (3)seeds of innovation, (4) attitude toward risk and (5) learningprocess. The common factor acting as the basis for the firms’ R&Dstructure was identified as ISO9001 which three firms commonlyintroduced and applied. Their HRD are also different, which are dueto (1) level of new employees and (2) the size of firm. The policyimplications for further promotion of innovation are also discussed.

발행기관:
기술경영경제학회
분류:
과학기술학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작