여객 운송중개 플랫폼 규제의 비교법적 고찰: 소비자보호의 관점에서

In nowadays, Transportation Network Company (TNC) is gaining great popularity among consumers. Numerous passengers consider TNC services as an advantage of services that do not refuse to ride on their destination and do not need to call out on the street. This study is based on the fact that the utilization rate of TNC platform in the passenger transportation market of Korea is increasing and focused on consumer protection. The jurisdictions that are allowing TNC to operate, whether under existing or new categories, generally have not been systematically revisiting the existing regulatory frameworks for historical incumbent taxi operators to examine whether these should be altered in light of the advent of the new platforms and other changes over time. In other words, regulators generally do not appear to be comprehensively rethinking taxi regulation, but rather reacting ad hoc to the arrival of the new entrants. First of all, we should thoroughly review U.S. TNC regulations and look for legislation related to TNC that is suitable for Korean market. In addition, it is necessary to analyze the cases of the U.S. and other countries where TNC services are actively used and refer to new legislation. Negotiating for basic information from TNCs and other providers of innovative mobility services in exchange for allowing them to operate is giving some jurisdictions a better understanding of the types and locations of the services these companies provide. As innovative mobility service companies become an increasingly important component of urban transportation networks, such information becomes essential for both regulation and transportation planning purposes.