패러다임의 전환을 통해 살펴본 ‘4.27 판문점 선언’의 법적 성격

At the Panmunjom on April 27, 2018, the South-North summit between President Moon Jae-in and North Korean leader Kim Jong Eun was held in Pyongyang since the two summit talks held in 1992 and 2007. It was an epoch-making event, such as an abrupt drop in the drought that has come in a country. However, the walking pace related to the ratification of the ‘4.27 Panmunjom Declaration’, which played a significant role in inducing reconciliation and peaceful atmosphere, is quite different from the hopeful atmosphere of the summit. Therefore, this debate on the ratification of the ‘4.27 Panmunjom Declaration’ by the National Assembly has been a challenge that has been raised every time the existing inter-Korean agreement is announced. I would like to reexamine the nature of the ‘4.27 Panmunjom Declaration’ in terms of the relationship between international law and domestic law, which is different from the existing approach, which is raised every time the inter-Korean agreement is announced. This paper examines the main progress of the inter - Korean summit that has been held several times since 1992 and the resulting inter - Korean agreement, and the series of arguments raised after the ‘4.27 Panmunjom Declaration’, and discusses the legal nature of the state of North Korea, the treaty of the ‘4.27 Panmunjom Declaration’, and the necessity of the Parliamentary ratification of the ‘4.27 Panmunjom Declaration’ in terms of the relationship between international law and domestic law. It analyzes and reviews the related contents and examines the changed elements according to the enactment of the inter-Korean relationship development law, thus re-examining the legal nature of the ‘4.27 Panmunjom Declaration’.