3.1 운동에 대한 보안법 적용이 타당성

In the full text of the Korean Constitution, "Our people, brilliant with their long history and tradition, were built by the March 1 Movement ...…As stated, the March 1 Independence Movement is an independence movement participated by the entire nation, unlike other forms of independence movements. However, the politics stipulated in the security law is the exercise of state power by the sovereign of the nation. Politics, then, should be seen as not including the issue of denying a country's sovereignty or sovereignty, but about the method of its power exercise and the organization of power distribution on the premise of the stability of its sovereignty or sovereignty. Therefore, the March 1st Movement is an act of denying or trying to deny imperial sovereignty, so this is not about politics. However, the court said that politics does not just refer to the way of imperial sovereignty, or to the organization of power distribution, but also to the existence of imperial sovereignty, and that the March 1 Movement is a violation of the security law. However, an act aimed at breaking away from the rule of imperial sovereignty should be regarded as an act of rebellion. However, during the Korean Empire, which will enact the security law, civil war can be punished. It is assumed that the Japanese government needed to put the security law to rest on the anti-independence protest rallies in various parts of the country, and that it judged the independence movement as an act of politics. However, the judgment of the Japanese court can be said to be that the Korean people's will to independence is strong to resist Japan's unjust aggression and support and regain national sovereignty.