애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문철학논총2019.04 발행

Aristotle and R. M. Hare on Prescriptivism

Aristotle and R. M. Hare on Prescriptivism

김도형(가톨릭관동대학교)

96권 2호, 129~143쪽

초록

Moral values are prescriptive both in Hare and Aristotle, but they see the prescriptive quality of moral values through somewhat different perspectives. Whereas Hare thinks that they are prescriptive due to the logical form of moral description, Aristotle thinks that they are so because of our cognitive nature to moral requirements. Therefore, clearly, it will be a mistake to call Aristotle a prescriptivist in the sense that Hare and other contemporary prescriptivists call themselves so. However, I see that although Aristotle and Hare do not derive the same argument, there are some significant common features in their conceptions of moral judgments. Hence, I will claim, showing those common elements between them, that Aristotle’s view of moral judgment is still ‘prescriptive’, it is so only in a qualified sense though.

Abstract

Moral values are prescriptive both in Hare and Aristotle, but they see the prescriptive quality of moral values through somewhat different perspectives. Whereas Hare thinks that they are prescriptive due to the logical form of moral description, Aristotle thinks that they are so because of our cognitive nature to moral requirements. Therefore, clearly, it will be a mistake to call Aristotle a prescriptivist in the sense that Hare and other contemporary prescriptivists call themselves so. However, I see that although Aristotle and Hare do not derive the same argument, there are some significant common features in their conceptions of moral judgments. Hence, I will claim, showing those common elements between them, that Aristotle’s view of moral judgment is still ‘prescriptive’, it is so only in a qualified sense though.

발행기관:
새한철학회
분류:
철학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
Aristotle and R. M. Hare on Prescriptivism | 철학논총 2019 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI