국민안전과 인권보호를 위한 테러방지법 개선방안 연구

The Republic of Korea is an area of the National Assembly of Terrorism. There are also few religious conflicts. Police are strictly managing gun guns, artillery guns, and gunpowder, which are the means to use terrorism. To date, there has never been a direct attack from international terrorist groups such as ISIS (Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, ISIS). It is not wrong to say that the outside world is a country that has heard of terrorism. However, it is questionable whether the country will be able to maintain the status of a terrorist This is not only because of external conditions, but also because domestic conditions are changing. In order to proactively respond to changes in security and security situations in Korea in 2016, it passed the Terrorism Prevention Act for the Protection of the People and Public Security (the “Terrorism Prevention Act”). Although there were political objections, it was meant to prevent serious crimes such as terrorism. However, a sober evaluation of the anti-terrorism bill, which has been 33 years since its enforcement, is needed. After the anti-terrorism bill, it should be considered whether it effectively supports anti-terrorism activities. We need to examine how the problems raised at the time of the enactment of the anti-terrorism bill have been improved. If necessary, the government should discuss resuming the anti-terrorism bill based on public consensus. Therefore, in this paper, after the Anti-Terrorism Act, we will evaluate the achievements of domestic anti-Terrorism policy, and then study the ways to improve the Anti-Terrorism Act for the Protection of Human Rights.