애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문사림2019.07 발행KCI 피인용 2

근대 서양 국제법의 ‘자결권’과 1919년 파리강화회의의 ‘민족자결’

Self-Determination of Modern International Law and ‘Self-Determination of Peoples’ at Paris Peace Conference

전상숙(광운대학교)

69호, 31~59쪽

초록

Colonial peoples’ ambition for national independence was stimulated by the fact that Paris Peace Conference was held based on Woodrow Wilson’s Fourteen Points which included ‘self-determination of peoples’. But national self-determination at Paris Peace Conference did not receive a full consideration by the imperial international power politics and neglected. Nevertheless, Peace treaty combined with Covenant of the League of Nations made the article no 22 stipulate that the ultimate purpose of mandatory rule was to lead territories of mandatorily ruled be self-determinate in the name of ‘sacred trust of civilization.’ This is the reason that the declaration of self-determination of peoples during World War I and Paris Peace Conference have important meaning in the history of national self-determination. Mandatory rule at Paris Peace Conference was to defer self-determination and self-determination of peoples for the colonialized people. But the acknowledgement in the Covenant of the League of Nations that non-annexation was a general rule of the mandatory rule and self-determination was a ultimate goal of the mandatory rule system meant that Western advanced countries (“Family of Nations”) could not neglect self-determination of peoples any more. This shows a change in viewpoint about self-determination before and after the World War, which became a basis for colonial peoples to claim self-determination.

Abstract

Colonial peoples’ ambition for national independence was stimulated by the fact that Paris Peace Conference was held based on Woodrow Wilson’s Fourteen Points which included ‘self-determination of peoples’. But national self-determination at Paris Peace Conference did not receive a full consideration by the imperial international power politics and neglected. Nevertheless, Peace treaty combined with Covenant of the League of Nations made the article no 22 stipulate that the ultimate purpose of mandatory rule was to lead territories of mandatorily ruled be self-determinate in the name of ‘sacred trust of civilization.’ This is the reason that the declaration of self-determination of peoples during World War I and Paris Peace Conference have important meaning in the history of national self-determination. Mandatory rule at Paris Peace Conference was to defer self-determination and self-determination of peoples for the colonialized people. But the acknowledgement in the Covenant of the League of Nations that non-annexation was a general rule of the mandatory rule and self-determination was a ultimate goal of the mandatory rule system meant that Western advanced countries (“Family of Nations”) could not neglect self-determination of peoples any more. This shows a change in viewpoint about self-determination before and after the World War, which became a basis for colonial peoples to claim self-determination.

발행기관:
수선사학회
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.20457/SHA.69.2
분류:
역사학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
근대 서양 국제법의 ‘자결권’과 1919년 파리강화회의의 ‘민족자결’ | 사림 2019 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI