균형있는 국가 인적자원개발 위한 교육제도 개편 방안: 「2022 대입개편 방안」과 「고교학점제」를 중심으로

Moon Administration had suggested Credit System in high school and absolute evaluation of all the subjects in College Education Capacity Test(CECT) as the presidential election pledge. Because the conservative opposed this, Education Ministry demanded a reasonable solution for the people to compromise to National Education Board for. The main contents suggested by National Education Board were enlargement more than 30% of CECT Achievement, maintenance of relative evaluation of main subjects in CECT, and permission of college discretion whether it reflects the minimum level of CECT achievement in Irregular Entrance Examination. Such decisions result in enlargement and reinforcement of the private education sector rather than the public one. Thus, Seoul(Gangnam), the rich, and the conservative rather than province, the poor, and the liberal take advantage. In addition, existing education problems such as cramming and memorizing method of teaching, absence of creative and confused education, and negligence of the whole-man education may worsen. As a result the complementary measures for those are needed. And because Credit System in high school takes absolute evaluation as the premise, its discrimination judgement is impossible. Furthermore, in small sized schools owing to impossibilities to secure various subjects and teachers, the system can not operate successfully. Credit system has to be fundamentally reconsidered.