형용사 파생 접미사의 심리적 실재성

The results of this thesis on the psychological reality of extractable suffixes in Korean compound adjectives can be summarized as follows. First, among adjective-derived suffixes: ''-gut'a, -nada, -jjeokt'a, -deoda, -ropt'a1, -ropt'a2, -seureopt'a, -eumjiksreupt'a, -daratha, -dapt'a1, -dapt'a2, -matt'a, -hada" have a psychological reality that is no different from the corresponding derivative adjectives, and "-eumjikseureopta" and "-jida” are not considered to have the same psychological realities as the corresponding derivative adjectives. Second, among the derivative adjectives to be studied, "k'ott'apt'a, shinsadapt'a, saljida, bangjeungmatt'a, dajeonhada" cannot be said to have the same psychological reality as the derivative adjectives belonging to the same type. The morphological implications from these verification results are as follows. First, the test results strongly support the theoretical premise of morphological research based on the concept of the self-organization of mental lexicon. Among the adjective-deriving suffixes, only "-eumjikseureopta" and "-jida” showed a test result against the theory as a whole. The case of "-eumjikseureopta" was explained through the lexical association of the '-eumjikhada' family and the raising of the internal position in the lexico based on the alternative word formation. The case of "-jida” can be explained by the fact that the self-organization of the lexicon is hampered by the old-fashioned nature of the corresponding compound word and the subject's low familiarity with them. Secondly, the result of the test that "shinsadapt'a, dajeonhada" do not have an independent representation in the lexicon is because of its status as a syntactic unit of '-dapt'a' and '-hada'. The results of the test for "k'ott'apt'a, saljida, bangjeungmatt'a" can be explained by the low lexical familiarity of subjects with those compound words.