상가건물임대차보호법에서 임차인의 해지통고기간에 관한 연구

The protection of tenants' status has been strengthened recently by the continuous revision of the Commercial Building Rental Protection Act, but the number of counseling and mediation applications for conflicts between real-world tenants and renters is increasing now. This study was reviewed by comparing the difference between the effective period of annulment notification in the Commercial Building Rental Protection Act and the period of notice period and the terms of termination in the Foreign Rental Act and the Housing Rental Protection Act. As a result of the review, the notice in the Act that the tenant's contract is terminated at the end date before the termination of the contract is regarded as the right to form a legal effect upon notification by either party. In addition, the Act does not specify the period of notice of termination of the tenant, so the status of the tenant facing termination of the contract may fall into a status of performance delay, and there may be disputes over the effect of termination. Therefore, the lease contract of the commercial building should give the tenant a longer time to notify the termination than the current minimum one month, and the revision of the legal regulation should be considered to ensure that the lease contract is stable by specifying the period of notice of termination and date of effect of the tenant.