애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문언어2019.12 발행KCI 피인용 1

A Distinctive Collexeme Analysis of -(u)m and -ki in Korean

A Distinctive Collexeme Analysis of -(u)m and -ki in Korean

이용훈(전남대학교); 조기현(군산대학교)

44권 4호, 901~921쪽

초록

This paper investigated the properties of Korean nominalizer -(u)m and -ki using a distinctive collexeme analysis (DCA; Gries and Stefanowitch, 2004b). In this study, all the sentences with Korean nominalizer -(u)m and -ki were extracted from the Sejong Treebank. Then, a DCA was applied to the extracted corpus data. A DCA is known to be a statistical analysis which identifies the lexemes with a strong preference for one of the alternations. The analysis results demonstrated which predicates prefer -(u)m and which ones prefer -ki. Through the analysis, the followings were observed: (i) The collostructional strengths (CS) were differentiated in two dimensions (-(u)m vs. -ki and matrix predicate vs. complement predicate), (ii) -(u)m nominals have stronger CS values than -ki nominals, (iii) a lot of predicates can combine with -(u)m or -ki to form a nominal but that only some predicates -(u)m or -ki nominals as a complement, and (iv) Matrix predicates have stronger CS values than complement predicates.

Abstract

This paper investigated the properties of Korean nominalizer -(u)m and -ki using a distinctive collexeme analysis (DCA; Gries and Stefanowitch, 2004b). In this study, all the sentences with Korean nominalizer -(u)m and -ki were extracted from the Sejong Treebank. Then, a DCA was applied to the extracted corpus data. A DCA is known to be a statistical analysis which identifies the lexemes with a strong preference for one of the alternations. The analysis results demonstrated which predicates prefer -(u)m and which ones prefer -ki. Through the analysis, the followings were observed: (i) The collostructional strengths (CS) were differentiated in two dimensions (-(u)m vs. -ki and matrix predicate vs. complement predicate), (ii) -(u)m nominals have stronger CS values than -ki nominals, (iii) a lot of predicates can combine with -(u)m or -ki to form a nominal but that only some predicates -(u)m or -ki nominals as a complement, and (iv) Matrix predicates have stronger CS values than complement predicates.

발행기관:
한국언어학회
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.18855/lisoko.2019.44.4.010
분류:
언어학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
A Distinctive Collexeme Analysis of -(u)m and -ki in Korean | 언어 2019 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI