정치적 관리 전략을 적용한 지방교육재정교부금법 개정과정 분석

The purpose of this study is to discuss in terms of "strategic management" what methods and strategies have been employed by which organizations have been used to implement legal revisions. The main focus of this paper is to uncover the organization's strategy in the policy-making process. The results of the study are as follows. First, entrepreneurial advocacy strategies included mass mobilization strategies such as signature campaigns, solidarity campaigns, campaigns, media such as press releases, statements, press conferences, research results, knowledge mobilization strategies through discussion sessions, and legislative cooperation between the ruling and opposition parties. On the other hand, the Education Ministry did not take direct action and gave the National Assembly the initiative, giving support to the ministry at a practical level. Second, as a policy development management strategy, the Education Ministry sought advice from the academic community and utilized the new Education Community Committee. Third, the negotiation strategy expanded the participants through various civic and social solidarity and exerted pressure by sending policy consultation and public inquiry from the KFTA. Fourth, the National Movement Headquarters held a launching ceremony and a press conference with public deliberation and social learning strategies. Finally, a concise but specific catchphrase was used for marketing and strategic communication strategies. The contribution of the study is that unlike most studies so far surrounding the process of revising the local education finance subsidy law have been discussed at the policy and legal levels, discussions can be supplemented at the political level. It is also meaningful to discuss strategies to induce further policy changes.