구분소유적 공유관계의 법적 구성에 관한 검토

It is called sectional co-ownership relations that two or more persons agreed to specify the location and area of real estate and to hold sectional ownership, and they make a registration in proportion to their own shares as sectional co-ownership. There are some questions of requisites of establishing, grounds of rule, effects on sectional ownership, because of no provisions in Korea Civil Act. With regard to legal character of sectional co-ownership, the are two theories in Korea, - theory of co-ownership and theory of title trust(judicial precedent). This paper points out that each theory is deficient in solving all the problems on sectional co-ownership. There are many advanced researches on sectional co-ownership. This paper focused on the fields that are not reviewed or are not sufficiently examined by other advanced researches. This paper looks on the problems of objective indicator to make border between co-owners. If there were no physical borders specifying the location and area of each sectional co-owners, sectional ownership may not be granted on the lands or buildings. Both theories grant that, the sectional co-owner can lease to third person on the sectional part of the co-owned land or building. On the sectional co-owner's leasing acts to third person on the sectional part of the co-owned land or building, the agreement between co-owners should be the grounds for the certain co-owner's. But, for applicant for registration of leasehold, all the co-owners should apply for registration to the registration office, because a registrar may not know the existence of the sectional co-ownership contracts between co-owners. When Certain co-owners transferred to third person the parts, his or her exclusively occupying parts of the land or the building, there are controversy about the grounds for keeping on the sectional co-ownership between assignee of sectional co-ownership and other sectional co-owner. Title trust theory explains it with implied consent theory that grants the existence of consent between assignee of sectional co-ownership and other sectional co-owner. But, co-ownership theory explains it that a claim that one of co-owners holds against other co-owners with respect to the property in co-ownership, may be exercised against their specific assignee. But this paper points out that co-ownership theory may beyond the limits of Korea Civil Code, not providing the provision for applying covenant between co-owners to the assignee.