일본의 방위장비이전 3원칙에 관한 비판적 고찰

In this study, the three principles of arms export and defense equipment transfer were outlined, the two systems were compared and analyzed, and the blind spots and problems of principle were drawn. If approached from the 'norm' point of view, the introduction of new rule and these trends in Japan do not conform to the course of action as a peace state, and based on the security dilemma theory presented by J. Herz, it was judged that the creation of conflict and instability in the international community, particularly the acceleration, escalation of tension and conflict within Asia. Also, this study set rational decision as the national interest in economic terms and looked at the performance of about five years after the introduction of new rule. Japan's defense industry players are carrying out domestic-oriented projects, but their significant overseas performance has been shown to be nonexistent in exports and international joint development. Many cases of failure to win orders and negotiation were also confirmed. Furthermore, in terms of international joint development, it was amended in a way that actually allowed the operation of the system in principle 2 in terms of international regulations, but the international joint development project with the U.S., which was actively carried out during the operation of the old rule, was also confirmed to have not made any progress.