애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문Korea Legislation Research Institute Journal of Law and Legislation2020.05 발행

EU Protection of the Right to Privacy and Right to Personal Data and their Connection to The Gonzales Case and Beyond

EU Protection of the Right to Privacy and Right to Personal Data and their Connection to The Gonzales Case and Beyond

티티리가(인하대학교)

10권 1호, 139~164쪽

초록

Protections of the right to privacy concerning publications have a relatively long history in Europe. The first part of the article explores comparatively and historically, the mechanisms of such protections originated in the 19th century Germany and synthesized brilliantly by Brandeis and Warren in the U.S. This part includes a brief overview of European supranational protection of the right to privacy, as framed in article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights and, more recently, in article 7 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. The protections of the right to personal data in digital processing is a more recent occurrence in Europe. Few national constitutions or international instruments recognize such rights, and even fewer jurisdictional remedies are associated with it. There are some significant exceptions, mainly at the supranational level, such as the EU Data Protection Directive (recently replaced by the EU General Data Protection Regulation) and Article 8 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. The second part of the article briefly explores these protections, their inherent logic, and the implementing mechanisms as clearly different from those characterizing the protections of the right to privacy. The third part examines the articulation between the two protection mechanisms, as reflected by the reasoning of the European Union Court of Justice on the famous Gonzales case. The decision implemented a right of de-listing as “right to be forgotten on the Internet” by the search engines. We propose a new reading for the reasoning of the Court, which underlines the essential role of protections of the right to privacy in grounding and circumscribing the data protection mechanisms of the EU Data Protection Directive within the decision. Last but not least, the article asses that the newly adopted EU General Data Protection Regulation will not affect the precedent created by the Gonzales and the adequate remedies it implemented.

Abstract

Protections of the right to privacy concerning publications have a relatively long history in Europe. The first part of the article explores comparatively and historically, the mechanisms of such protections originated in the 19th century Germany and synthesized brilliantly by Brandeis and Warren in the U.S. This part includes a brief overview of European supranational protection of the right to privacy, as framed in article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights and, more recently, in article 7 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. The protections of the right to personal data in digital processing is a more recent occurrence in Europe. Few national constitutions or international instruments recognize such rights, and even fewer jurisdictional remedies are associated with it. There are some significant exceptions, mainly at the supranational level, such as the EU Data Protection Directive (recently replaced by the EU General Data Protection Regulation) and Article 8 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. The second part of the article briefly explores these protections, their inherent logic, and the implementing mechanisms as clearly different from those characterizing the protections of the right to privacy. The third part examines the articulation between the two protection mechanisms, as reflected by the reasoning of the European Union Court of Justice on the famous Gonzales case. The decision implemented a right of de-listing as “right to be forgotten on the Internet” by the search engines. We propose a new reading for the reasoning of the Court, which underlines the essential role of protections of the right to privacy in grounding and circumscribing the data protection mechanisms of the EU Data Protection Directive within the decision. Last but not least, the article asses that the newly adopted EU General Data Protection Regulation will not affect the precedent created by the Gonzales and the adequate remedies it implemented.

발행기관:
한국법제연구원
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.22851/kjll.2020.10.1.005
분류:
법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
EU Protection of the Right to Privacy and Right to Personal Data and their Connection to The Gonzales Case and Beyond | Korea Legislation Research Institute Journal of Law and Legislation 2020 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI