애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문과학기술과 법2020.06 발행KCI 피인용 7

직무발명보상금 산정에 있어서 전용실시료와 통상실시료의 비율에 근거한 독점권기여율(초과매출율)의 산정

Calculation of Exclusive Right Contribution Rate (Excess Revenue Rate) Based on Exclusive License Royalty & Non-exclusive License Royalty in Calculating Employee Invention Remuneration

정차호(성균관대학교); 文麗花(中國 烟台大学 法学院 (大学講師))

11권 1호, 211~262쪽

초록

Section 10(1) of the Invention Promotion Act prescribes that if the inventor employee owns patent of the employee invention, the employer company owns free non-exclusive right of the employee invention. (Under the current case law) Based on the provision, the company’s profit, used for calculating employee invention remuneration, is calculated by deducting the profit which the company would have achieved from the free non-exclusive right from the profit which the company would have achieved from the patent exclusive right. Exclusive right contribution rate (hereinafter “ERCR”) is defined as rate of exclusive revenue and excess revenue. Here exclusive revenue means revenue based on patent right and excess revenue means exclusive revenue minus revenue based on non-exclusive right. In Japan, it is called as excess revenue rate. This paper has explored calculation jurisprudence on ERCR. As results of such explore, the followings have been found. Firstly, in Korean and Japanese cases, our authors have failed to find a case which clearly understood concept of ERCR and clearly applied the concept to the given fact patterns. Secondly, the paper has suggested a new method, which calculates ERCR based on rate of exclusive right royalty and non-exclusive right royalty. Thirdly, in the same parties and the same circumstances, exclusive royalty rate is about two times bigger than non-exclusive royalty rate. Fourthly, under a normal situation where the defendant company’s market share as non-exclusive licensee is 50% and exclusive royalty rate is about two times bigger than non-exclusive royalty rate, ERCR is 75%. Fifthly, the court on the one hand should remember such 75% number as an important reference, and on the other hand should further try to find (1) difference of exclusive right royalty rate and non-exclusive right royalty rate and (2) the defendant company’s hypothetical market share as a non-exclusive licensee.

Abstract

Section 10(1) of the Invention Promotion Act prescribes that if the inventor employee owns patent of the employee invention, the employer company owns free non-exclusive right of the employee invention. (Under the current case law) Based on the provision, the company’s profit, used for calculating employee invention remuneration, is calculated by deducting the profit which the company would have achieved from the free non-exclusive right from the profit which the company would have achieved from the patent exclusive right. Exclusive right contribution rate (hereinafter “ERCR”) is defined as rate of exclusive revenue and excess revenue. Here exclusive revenue means revenue based on patent right and excess revenue means exclusive revenue minus revenue based on non-exclusive right. In Japan, it is called as excess revenue rate. This paper has explored calculation jurisprudence on ERCR. As results of such explore, the followings have been found. Firstly, in Korean and Japanese cases, our authors have failed to find a case which clearly understood concept of ERCR and clearly applied the concept to the given fact patterns. Secondly, the paper has suggested a new method, which calculates ERCR based on rate of exclusive right royalty and non-exclusive right royalty. Thirdly, in the same parties and the same circumstances, exclusive royalty rate is about two times bigger than non-exclusive royalty rate. Fourthly, under a normal situation where the defendant company’s market share as non-exclusive licensee is 50% and exclusive royalty rate is about two times bigger than non-exclusive royalty rate, ERCR is 75%. Fifthly, the court on the one hand should remember such 75% number as an important reference, and on the other hand should further try to find (1) difference of exclusive right royalty rate and non-exclusive right royalty rate and (2) the defendant company’s hypothetical market share as a non-exclusive licensee.

발행기관:
법학연구소
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.34267/cbstl.2020.11.1.211
분류:
법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
직무발명보상금 산정에 있어서 전용실시료와 통상실시료의 비율에 근거한 독점권기여율(초과매출율)의 산정 | 과학기술과 법 2020 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI