DMZ의 평화적 이용에 관한 사법적 고찰

After removing the mines buried in the DMZ, proposals for international peace zones, such as the attraction of historical and cultural facilities such as ecological parks and museums, the attraction of international organizations, and the creation of inter-Korean cooperative farms, are important for pursuing peace and coexistence on the Korean Peninsula and a model for a unified nation. It is fortunate that it is unfortunate to be able to utilize some of the peace for the Korean Peninsula while preserving the newly formed ecological environment because human footsteps have not been reached for over 70 years. To this end, there are many issues that require cooperation from the international community, so there is a limit that the Korean government cannot arbitrarily approach. For example, the issue of coordination of jurisdiction under the South-North Agreement and the Military Armistice Agreement is a matter of international law. In this article, these international legal issues are taken into consideration, and are considered from a civil law point of view. The civil law issue on the peaceful use of the DMZ can be said to be the land re- investigation and the realignment of ownership and guarantee of the right of use for the Daesung-dong residents. First of all, DMZ, where civilian access is restricted, is not possible for land re-investigation by nature, so there are still borderless lands and unowned lands. Therefore, through the enactment of the special law, it is necessary to re-examine the land property. Second, in order to maintain the DMZ's peaceful use efficiently and continuously, nationalization measures on private lands are necessary. According to the Land Acceptance Act, nationalization must be achieved through' just compensation', and if necessary, the right to purchase can be exercised. Lastly, to secure the right to live in Daeseong-dong, it is necessary to devise a way to secure the right to cultivation under a public rental System.