지방의회 행정사무감사 정례회 시기별 차이에 관한 분석: 수원시 의회를 중심으로

Administrative affairs audit is an institutional device that enables local councils to criticize and monitor whether local policies have been properly implemented by the enforcement agency. In addition, it is a device to disclose or provide the data of the executive agency to the residents in order to satisfy the residents' right to know. This study explores how the effectiveness of administrative affairs audit varies depending on the timing. Specifically, as the number of inquiries changed by period and audits were conducted at the 1st and 2nd regular meetings, an analysis was conducted on whether the connection between the auditors was strengthened, and the differences in audit contents by period were analyzed. As a result of the analysis, it can be seen that the audits centered on issues are in progress regardless of the 1st regular meeting or the 2nd regular meeting. In addition, based on the results of QAP correlation-regression analysis, the results of analyzing audit contents by period showed approximately 11.7% correlation, and other than that, it was confirmed that independent query contents were formed by period. Therefore, it is necessary to secure flexibility in the audit period and devise a plan to improve efficiency by supplementing the problems that may occur according to the differences in each period.