애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문경쟁법연구2020.11 발행KCI 피인용 1

국내 경쟁법 절차에 비밀유지권 도입 검토 - 일본의 제도를 중심으로 -

A Study on the Introduction of the Legal Professional Privilege in Competition Law Procedures: Focused on the procedure of Japan

김효성(법무법인 화우)

42권, 120~146쪽

초록

This article mainly focused on explaining the details of the Legal Professional Privilege(“LPP”), which is recently introduced in the competition law procedure of Japan, and looking at the implications that should be considered when the LPP is introduced in South Korea. The new LPP system in Japan has a similar form to the EU competition law with respect to its content and procedures. Although the scope of the LPP is limited to cases related to cartels, the introduction of the LPP is important since Japan was one of the few countries where the LPP was not recognized. The Supreme Court of South Korea explicitly denied the LPP in 2012, but there is ample need for the exchange of legal communication between an attorney and client to be recognized as a secret as part of the right to defend in the competition law procedure in Korea. After the introduction of LPP in Japan, South Korea become the only OECD member country that denies the LPP in competition law. Thus, it is necessary to recognize the LPP in the competition law enforcement system as soon as possible. Regarding the specifics of the LPP, the discussion could be based on the content of the LPP system in the EU and Japan.

Abstract

This article mainly focused on explaining the details of the Legal Professional Privilege(“LPP”), which is recently introduced in the competition law procedure of Japan, and looking at the implications that should be considered when the LPP is introduced in South Korea. The new LPP system in Japan has a similar form to the EU competition law with respect to its content and procedures. Although the scope of the LPP is limited to cases related to cartels, the introduction of the LPP is important since Japan was one of the few countries where the LPP was not recognized. The Supreme Court of South Korea explicitly denied the LPP in 2012, but there is ample need for the exchange of legal communication between an attorney and client to be recognized as a secret as part of the right to defend in the competition law procedure in Korea. After the introduction of LPP in Japan, South Korea become the only OECD member country that denies the LPP in competition law. Thus, it is necessary to recognize the LPP in the competition law enforcement system as soon as possible. Regarding the specifics of the LPP, the discussion could be based on the content of the LPP system in the EU and Japan.

발행기관:
한국경쟁법학회
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.35770/jkcl.2020.42..120
분류:
기타법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
국내 경쟁법 절차에 비밀유지권 도입 검토 - 일본의 제도를 중심으로 - | 경쟁법연구 2020 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI