공공갈등과정에서 사회집단의 역할유형 분석: 갈등의 발생책임과 해소노력을 중심으로

This study analyzes the role-types of social groups in terms of responsibility for conflict occurrence and efforts to resolve conflicts. The results are as follows. First, the National Assembly, the Media, the central government, the President, and the legal community have a relatively high responsibility for conflict occurrence. Second, citizens perceived the conflict resolution efforts of the President, NGOs, local governments, and central governments relatively high. Third, the role-types of social group in the conflict process are as follows. The President and the central government have high responsibility for conflict occurrence and high efforts to resolve conflict(TypeⅠ). The National Assembly, the Media, the legal community have high responsibility for conflict occurrence and low efforts to resolve conflict(TypeⅡ). Academia, NGOs, the local government have low responsibility for conflict occurrence and high efforts to resolve conflict(TypeⅢ). Labor, business, and religious groups have low responsibility for conflict occurrence and low efforts to resolve conflict(TypeⅣ). Based on the results, the researchers suggested that the TypeⅢ group should be given sufficient opportunity and public authority for conflict management, and the TypeⅢ and TypeⅠ should play a role as a key group in institutionalized conflict management in the future.