노동시장의 내부자는 외부자와 다른 정책 선호를 갖는가?: 가구 효과 분석

This paper attempts to confirm the difference in social policy preferences of insiders and outsiders. In particular, analyzing the household effect is our main analysis task. I use a question asking whether minimum livelihood is guaranteed even for those who are capable of working. In order to carry out this task, it is necessary to operationalize insiders and outsiders, and we tried to apply two commonly used methods at the same time. The first is the approach to the labor market position, which is a method of using the current employment status of workers as the basis for the distinction between insiders and outsiders. We included regular workers in large corporations as insiders, and non-regular workers, unemployed workers, and regular workers in SMEs as outsiders. Through this method, as a result of performing an ordered logistic regression analysis with preferences of “minimum livelihood guarantee” as a dependent variable, it was confirmed that there was a difference in preferences by household type. The second is the occupation-class approach, which is not an employment status, but a method of calculating the outsiderness by calculating the probability of experiencing labor market risks through the type of occupation he performs. As a result of analyzing the variables that caused the difference in preferences of “minimum livelihood guarantee” using this method, the influence of the spouse’s labor market position was confirmed. It was confirmed that although men’s attitudes toward welfare are formed independently from the spouse’s labor market situation, women’s attitudes toward welfare depend on their spouse’s labor market status.