연관규칙 분석을 통한 ESG 우려사안 키워드 도출에관한 연구

Purpose The purpose of this study is to define the anti-ESG activities of companies recognized by media by reflecting ESG recently attracted attention. This study extracts keywords for ESG controversies through association rule mining. Design/methodology/approach A research framework is designed to extract keywords for ESG controversies as follows: 1) From DeepSearch DB, we collect 23,837 articles on anti-ESG activities exposed to 130 media from 2013 to 2018 of 294 listed companies with ESG ratings 2) We set keywords related to environment, social, and governance, and delete or merge them with other keywords based on the support, confidence, and lift derived from association rule mining. 3) We illustrate the importance of keywords and the relevance between keywords through density, degree centrality, and closeness centrality on network analysis. Findings We identify a total of 26 keywords for ESG controversies. ‘Gapjil’ records the highest frequency, followed by ‘corruption’, ‘bribery’, and ‘collusion’. Out of the 26 keywords, 16 are related to governance, 8 to social, and 2 to environment. The keywords ranked high are mostly related to the responsibility of shareholders within corporate governance. ESG controversies associated with social issues are often related to unfair trade. As a result of confidence analysis, the keywords related to social and governance are clustered and the probability of mutual occurrence between keywords is high within each group. In particular, in the case of “owner’s arrest”, it is caused by “bribery” and “misappropriation” with an 80% confidence level. The result of network analysis shows that ‘corruption’ is located in the center, which is the most likely to occur alone, and is highly related to ‘breach of duty’, ‘embezzlement’, and ‘bribery’.