디지털 감시사회에서 개인정보보호와 정보보안 관리에 대한 고찰

· Research topic: Privacy and information security management · Research Background: Emergency seizure search for physical and fluid evidence can maintain an appropriate balance of privacy, freedom and information-self-determination rights of suspects, citing risks of harm to investigators and destruction of evidence. Electronic information stored on mobile phones is not a weapon or a weapon, and once confiscated, concerns about destroying evidence are significantly reduced (lack of urgency), and mobile phones contain a vast amount of sensitive information, which violates personal privacy and freedom of secrecy. As a result, the need for privacy in the digital surveillance society was the background of this study. · Differences from prior research: Under the current law, it should be considered that it is not allowed to search the suspect's mobile phone without a prior warrant. Therefore, this study goes further in the preceding paper and focuses on investigative Internet portal e-mail seizure, investigative search, current criminal procedures for personal information stored on mobile devices (smart phones), and suggestions for improvement. · Research Method: To promote follow-up thesis research by discussing issues related to the improvement of the legal system regarding the introduction of the information warrant system in the future by using current analysis on domestic and foreign information protection management. · Research results: According to the seizure and search procedures of the investigative agency, literature studies such as related papers and books were conducted, and research was conducted to first select subjects for improvement, and to derive improvement directions. · Contribution points and expected effects: (1) Academic expected effects: Electronic information warrants can be an academic guide by establishing an appropriate evidence collection system for the new environment. It is expected to present implications through reviewing problems of investigative agencies related to electronic information seizure and search, and to serve as guidelines for investigative agencies at the site of electronic information seizure and search. (2) Practical expected effect: We hope that the investigation will be justified by preventing abuse of investigative rights by investigative agencies, protecting basic rights of search-and-seekers, and further laying the groundwork for policy legislation.