영업비밀 침해금지기간 및 경업금지기간의 기산점 및 종점에 관한 연구
A Study on Starting Point & Ending Point of Trade Secret Infringement Injunction Period and Non-competition Injunction Period
장광홍(성균관대학교); 정차호(성균관대학교)
12권 1호, 245~298쪽
초록
This paper discusses starting point and ending point of each injunction period of three different situations, where trade secret injunction is requested, non-competition injunction is requested and both of them are requested. This paper specifies problems in many holdings of Korean courts as the followings: (1) many holdings do not tell the difference between a preventive injunction against future acts and a damages remedy on past acts; (2) notwithstanding breach of a non-competition agreement, the court does not issue an injunction order under the reason that non-competition period has already expired; (3) even though certain information maintains trade secret status, many trade secret injunction orders have an ending point; (4) many holdings do not tell the difference between a non-competition case and a trade secret case. This paper proposes problem-solving jurisprudence as the followings. Firstly, starting point of injunction period shall be the holding day and any day before the holding day cannot be such a starting point. Injunction is remedy against future act after the holding day. On a past act, only damages remedy is available. Secondly, even though non-competition agreement period has expired during court proceeding, the court should, in an appropriate circumstance, issue a non-competition injunction order which starts from the holding day and remains for some period. Such jurisprudence which does not do so may make a non-competition agreement meaningless. Thirdly, in a trade secret infringement injunction order, a perpetual period without an ending point shall be the principle. Only if the defendant clearly proves that the information at issue shall lose its trade secret status in the not-so-distant future, the court may exceptionally set an ending point of the injunction period. Fourthly, the court shall differentiate among a trade secret injunction case, a non-competition injunction case and a case where two injunctions were requested together and shall hold in accordance with character of the request.
Abstract
This paper discusses starting point and ending point of each injunction period of three different situations, where trade secret injunction is requested, non-competition injunction is requested and both of them are requested. This paper specifies problems in many holdings of Korean courts as the followings: (1) many holdings do not tell the difference between a preventive injunction against future acts and a damages remedy on past acts; (2) notwithstanding breach of a non-competition agreement, the court does not issue an injunction order under the reason that non-competition period has already expired; (3) even though certain information maintains trade secret status, many trade secret injunction orders have an ending point; (4) many holdings do not tell the difference between a non-competition case and a trade secret case. This paper proposes problem-solving jurisprudence as the followings. Firstly, starting point of injunction period shall be the holding day and any day before the holding day cannot be such a starting point. Injunction is remedy against future act after the holding day. On a past act, only damages remedy is available. Secondly, even though non-competition agreement period has expired during court proceeding, the court should, in an appropriate circumstance, issue a non-competition injunction order which starts from the holding day and remains for some period. Such jurisprudence which does not do so may make a non-competition agreement meaningless. Thirdly, in a trade secret infringement injunction order, a perpetual period without an ending point shall be the principle. Only if the defendant clearly proves that the information at issue shall lose its trade secret status in the not-so-distant future, the court may exceptionally set an ending point of the injunction period. Fourthly, the court shall differentiate among a trade secret injunction case, a non-competition injunction case and a case where two injunctions were requested together and shall hold in accordance with character of the request.
- 발행기관:
- 법학연구소
- 분류:
- 법학