애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문법학논총2021.06 발행

中国商标侵权惩罚性赔偿制度的实践探究

Research on the Practice of Punitive Compensation System for Trademark Infringement in China

周玲艳(青島大学); 郭谊(전주대학교); 제혜금(전주대학교)

45권 2호, 219~234쪽

초록

自《商标法》引入惩罚性赔偿制度以来,成为近几年来较热话题,知识产权产业近年来蓬勃发展,公民维护知识产权意识也不断增强。在立法方面中国已经完成了关于知识产权惩罚性赔偿的制度构建。但是,在发展过程中也不断出现一些侵权问题,尤其是在商标侵权方面更为严重。因此,在《商标法》中有必要引入惩罚性赔偿制度。《商标法》惩罚性赔偿制度的引入可以有效遏制侵权行为发生,维护权利人利益。但是,根据笔者调研搜集近几年资料发现,尽管《商标法》规定了惩罚性赔偿条款,而法院在审理时却很少使用该条款,大部分使用的是补偿性赔偿条款。究其原因,主要是由于《商标法》第63条规定比较粗糙,对于认定侵权的条件没有做出详细规定,导致在许多方面存在争议。尤其是确定计算赔偿基数、程序保障完善以及混淆法定赔偿与惩罚性赔偿等问题突出。导致实务法官中在适用惩罚性赔偿条款方面仍存在很多问题。惩罚性赔偿制度以惩罚为核心功能,以遏制为目标功能,在多种法律责任经合的情形下应优先适用。在司法裁判中需要把握好惩罚性赔偿责任的构成要件。同时正确运用计算规则。本文从实践出发,根据近几年惩罚性赔偿制度在实践中应用的情况,探索该制度在理论以及实践方面存在的问题,并根据发现的一些问题提出一些完善建议,促进惩罚性赔偿制度的完善和更新。

Abstract

Since the introduction of the punitive compensation system in the Trademark Law, it has become a hot topic in recent years. The intellectual property industry has been booming in recent years, and citizens' awareness of protecting intellectual property rights has also been increasing. In terms of legislation, China has completed the construction of the punitive compensation system for intellectual property rights. However, in the process of development, there have been some infringement problems, especially in the trademark infringement. Therefore, it is necessary to introduce punitive compensation system in trademark law. The introduction of the punitive compensation system in Trademark Law can effectively curb the occurrence of infringement and safeguard the interests of the obligee. However, according to the information collected in recent years, the author found that although the Trademark Law stipulates the punitive damages clause, the court rarely uses this clause in the trial, and most of them use the compensatory damages clause. The main reason is that the provisions in Article 63 of the Trademark Law are relatively rough and the conditions for identifying infringement are not specified in detail, which leads to disputes in many aspects. In particular, there are some prominent problems such as determining the compensation base, perfecting the procedural guarantee and confusing the legal compensation and punitive compensation. As a result, there are still many problems in the application of punitive damages clause in practical judges. The punitive compensation system takes punishment as its core function and restraining as its objective function, so it should be applied in priority under the situation of multiple legal responsibilities. It is necessary to grasp the constitutive elements of punitive compensation liability in judicial judgment. At the same time, correct use of calculation rules. This paper, starting from practice, based on the punitive damages system in recent years in practice, to explore the system in theory and practice of the existing problems, and according to some of the problems found some suggestions for improvement, to promote the improvement and update of the punitive damages system.

발행기관:
법학연구소
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.17252/dlr.2021.45.2.008
분류:
법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
中国商标侵权惩罚性赔偿制度的实践探究 | 법학논총 2021 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI