법인기업 대표자 연대보증 폐지에 관한 정책 변동 연구: 정책 내러티브의 활용 양상을 중심으로

This study analyzes policy narratives in the policy change of abolishing the joint guarantor on public guarantee system for the corporation representatives. The Narrative Policy Framework(NPF) has developed with the concept of the narrative regarded as policy change factor and it helps to understand the mechanism of the policy change. The analysis framework in this study is composed of several narrative components which are policy belief, policy narrative strategy, setting and character. Competing policy actors in the case of abolishing the joint guarantor on public guarantee system for the corporation representatives splitted into two groups like pro-guarantor and anti-guarantor. Each group tried to persuade the public by applying various narrative components to put each their preference into policy change. The major findings are as follows. Both of pro-guarantor and anti-guarantor were standing on the setting of national economic development but different policy beliefs created a competition. situation. The policy belief of anti-guarantor coalitions was promotion of start-ups and that of pro-guarantor coalitions was responsible management. Both used only Devil–shift strategy without Angel-shift. And ‘distribution of benefits and costs’ strategy was also applied to each group narrative but anti-guarantor coalitions used more narrative strategies such as rhetorical narrative strategy. In this case, using more diverse narrative strategies affects the public by helping the public better recognize their costs and burdens.