애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문민사소송2021.10 발행KCI 피인용 4

성년후견개시심판에서 처분권주의 — 대법원 2021. 6. 10. 선고 2020스596 결정에 관하여 —

Principle of Disposition in Adjudication on Commencement of Adult Guardianship — Regarding the Supreme Court Decision 2020su596 on June 10th, 2021 —

오진숙(서울대학교 법학전문대학원 공익법률센터)

25권 3호, 99~124쪽

초록

The Supreme Court Decision 2020su596 rendered on June 10th, 2021 decided that the family court can adjudicate on the commencement of Limited Guardianship for a person despite the application for the Commencement of adult guardianship in this case. And the family court can also adjudicate on the commencement of adult guardianship despite the application for the commencement of limited guardianship. However, The concept of principle of disposition and the pleading principle is different and should be distinguished. Principle of disposition also applies to family non-contentious litigation case that can be investigated ex officio by the court. The subject-matter of lawsuit of adjudication on commencement of adult guardianship and adjudication on commencement of limited guardianship are different, the family court can adjudicate on the commencement of the type of guardianship applied by the parties. In particular, adjudication on commencement of adult guardianship despite the application for the commencement of limited guardianship is contrary to the principle of the adult guardianship system that guarantees the person's right to self-determination as much as possible. Therefore, the family court can adjudicate on the commencement of the type of Guardianship applied by the parties and if commencement of adult guardianship is contrary to the welfare of an adult, the family court have to explain to alter the application.

Abstract

The Supreme Court Decision 2020su596 rendered on June 10th, 2021 decided that the family court can adjudicate on the commencement of Limited Guardianship for a person despite the application for the Commencement of adult guardianship in this case. And the family court can also adjudicate on the commencement of adult guardianship despite the application for the commencement of limited guardianship. However, The concept of principle of disposition and the pleading principle is different and should be distinguished. Principle of disposition also applies to family non-contentious litigation case that can be investigated ex officio by the court. The subject-matter of lawsuit of adjudication on commencement of adult guardianship and adjudication on commencement of limited guardianship are different, the family court can adjudicate on the commencement of the type of guardianship applied by the parties. In particular, adjudication on commencement of adult guardianship despite the application for the commencement of limited guardianship is contrary to the principle of the adult guardianship system that guarantees the person's right to self-determination as much as possible. Therefore, the family court can adjudicate on the commencement of the type of Guardianship applied by the parties and if commencement of adult guardianship is contrary to the welfare of an adult, the family court have to explain to alter the application.

발행기관:
한국민사소송법학회
분류:
법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
성년후견개시심판에서 처분권주의 — 대법원 2021. 6. 10. 선고 2020스596 결정에 관하여 — | 민사소송 2021 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI