공공고용서비스와 실업급여의 ‘역사제도적’ 동학

The various introductions of public employment services(PESs) in foreign countries are not satisfied due to the lack of explanations about the relationship with unemployment benefits. With this in mind, this paper attempts to explain the historical institutionalization processes by comparative studies, deviding the processes into an integrated type and a separate one. For example, PESs are mostly run by state with the principle of the ILO's public monopoly on job brokerage in 1919, whereas unemployment insurance based on the Ghent system mainly operates with various forms. Meanwhile, in the countries such as the UK and Korea run in a way of compulsory unemployment insurance, PESs and unemplyment insurance become centrally-integrated forms. While the relationship between unemployment insurance and PESs has been maintained stable, the connection between PESs and unemployment assistance has become unstable. The rapid and radical innovations of PESs over the past 20~30 years have continued for unemployment assistance benefit recipients, appearing in two forms of decentralization types, one-stop, and marketization types, gateway. The demonstrations indicate that the institutional systems of PESs need to be modified to align with the unemployment benefit program.