체육수업 안전사고 판례와 체육교사 및 수업현장 중심의 담론 분석

This study aims to qualitatively interpret the meaning of the discourses on safety accidents in physical education classes formed in judicial precedents, physical education teachers, and class sites to reform safety accidents in physical education classes. This research method applied discourse analysis from the perspective of analytical structuralism. As a result of study, First, the text discourse analysis focusing on judicial precedents showed the importance of being included in the accident recognition criteria of the School Safety Act. Second, in the case of safety accidents in physical education classes, material compensation is considered more important than in classes. Third, various side effects occur because of safety accidents in physical education classes. Meanwhile, in-depth interviews with physical education teachers’ contextual discourse focusing on the class field showed that first, the analysis of the current situation showed various uncontrollable situations and concerns of teachers. Second, efforts and marginal diagnoses dealt with positive responses, but teachers’ efforts and frustration due to environmental factors appeared. Third, opinions of wishful thinking were expressed to regret of the field experience and showed the need for a practical and preventive approach afterward. In conclusion, safety accidents in physical education classes were as follows. First, the law’s boundaries were built on the judgment of safety accidents in physical education classes, creating preconceived notions and stigma. Second, the type of judicial precedents was material compensation oriented, and the essential purpose of reducing, preventing, and reforming safety accidents in physical education classes was not reached. Third, at the scene of safety accidents in physical education classes, physical education teachers were continuously involved in self-reflection, practical attitudes, and reformations.