도시재생에 따른 도시재생지원센터와 주민협의체의 개선방안 연구

The current administration has proposed an urban regeneration policy to encourage the voluntary participation of residents around the community. As an alternative, a new deal project focuses on downtown- and common neighborhood-type revitalization projects for urban regeneration, and these types of projects place importance on the cooperation between intermediary organizations and residents. The Urban Regeneration Planning Group, which is a cooperative governed organization for urban regeneration projects, is making a plan for big flows in the government’s policies and budgets. The Urban Regeneration Center at metropolitan and lower-level local governments is an organization devoted to making and supporting strategic and revitalization plans for urban regeneration and supervising and coordinating urban regeneration business among related agencies and departments to push forward the project. The Field Urban Regeneration Center supports the efficient propulsion of revitalization projects and serves as a bridge between administrators and residents. In urban regeneration new deal projects, the concept of a middle management organization is to push forward the vitalization of urban regeneration based on cooperative governance among industry, academia, and private sectors by rejectingtop-down urban development led by the central and local government and making a bottom-up approach to ensure a win-win relationship with the residents. Middle management organizations play the role of supporting or coordinating the opinions of the residents based on their participation and encouragement of participation. Based on a residents participation-type urban regeneration, the residents organization resolves the conflicts of the residents, collects their opinions, and takes part in various projects in the community to ensure a sustainable urban regeneration project. There is, however, no clear separation of roles between an urban regeneration center and a field urban regeneration center. In the latter, the employees who are in charge of direct communication with residents treat them in unreasonable ways, which slows down the development of an urban regeneration project. Residents and the members of a residents organization have no clear understanding of urban regeneration and the initiative for their meanings, causing conflicts of interest between the government running a project and the urban regeneration center. It is critical that an urban regeneration center and the residents of a residents organization emphasize the importance of collaboration beyond their interests in urban regeneration. This raises a need for educational programs at the level of residents to induce their active participation. The local government and a field center of the central government should have respective roles that are understood clearly and provide stable financial support to reinforce an intermediary organization. This study sets out to examine the developmental situation of an urban regeneration project and investigates the current installations and roles of urban regeneration centers and the organization and management of a residents organization in a residents participation-type urban regeneration project based on a legal review and proposes improvement measures.