민법 제197조 제2항의 “소가 제기된 때”의 의미에 관하여
The Meaning of “The Time when such Action was Brought(Article 197, Paragraph 2 of the Civil Code)”
김기정(동아대학교 법학전문대학원)
26권 1호, 45~82쪽
초록
Article 197, Paragraph 1 of the Civil Code provides that it is presumed that a possessor of a thing possesses it with the intention to own, in good faith, in peace and in public. Paragraph 2 of the said Article provides that if a possessor in good faith is defeated in an action on the title, he/she shall be deemed to be a possessor in bad faith as from the time when such action was brought. The question here is whether “when such action was brought” thereunder means the date on which the action was filed or the date on which a duplicate of the complaint was served. Scholars without exception uphold the latter. However, it is questionable to interpret that the said provision of “when the action was brought” means the date on which a duplicate of the complaint was served, that is, the date on which the action became pending before the court, which runs against the language. In my view, it is on week ground to interpret the said provision means the date on which the action became pending before the court. Rather, based upon the principle of grammatical interpretation, it should be interpreted to mean the time when the complaint was filed with the court.
Abstract
Article 197, Paragraph 1 of the Civil Code provides that it is presumed that a possessor of a thing possesses it with the intention to own, in good faith, in peace and in public. Paragraph 2 of the said Article provides that if a possessor in good faith is defeated in an action on the title, he/she shall be deemed to be a possessor in bad faith as from the time when such action was brought. The question here is whether “when such action was brought” thereunder means the date on which the action was filed or the date on which a duplicate of the complaint was served. Scholars without exception uphold the latter. However, it is questionable to interpret that the said provision of “when the action was brought” means the date on which a duplicate of the complaint was served, that is, the date on which the action became pending before the court, which runs against the language. In my view, it is on week ground to interpret the said provision means the date on which the action became pending before the court. Rather, based upon the principle of grammatical interpretation, it should be interpreted to mean the time when the complaint was filed with the court.
- 발행기관:
- 한국민사소송법학회
- 분류:
- 법학