캘리포니아주 지구온난화해결법의 내용과 입법정책적 시사점

As climate warming intensifies, various types of abnormal climates are occurring frequently. It is threatening, with record cold waves, heavy snow, rainy seasons, and floods causing numerous deaths and victims, destroying the base of life, and predicting the disappearance of the Arctic glacier. Based on the perception of such warming issues, the international community agreed on the goal of implementing “2050 NetZero”. In particular, legislation and policies to realize carbon neutrality are actively underway at the national level in the United States, and policies are being implemented through carbon neutrality legislation with regional characteristics in autonomous states. In California, the crisis of climate change became serious early due to the geographical characteristics and industrial composition of the region, and related technologies such as carbon emission reduction and transportation and storage of emitted carbon were developed as countermeasures. In 2006, the California Global Warming Solutions Act (hereinafter referred to as “AB 32”) was enacted to establish an active legislative system and implement policies to reduce greenhouse effects. “AB 32” is significant in that it stipulates in detail relatively unconventional regulations, emission transactions, and related matters at the time of enactment and has been actively implemented in parking lots. However, since implementation strategies and tools at the international level have not been secured, there is a primary limitation of countermeasures at the autonomous state level. and The limitations of legislation at the state level and the acceptance of large companies' carbon emission regulations have also been raised, not at the national level or implementation of legislation throughout the United States. Korea is set to implement 「the Framework Act on Carbon Neutral and Green Growth to Response Crisis」 (hereinafter referred to as 「The Basic Law of Carbon Neutrality」) in 2022, and “AB 32” can be evaluated as suggesting various lessons in the process of establishing and executing related systems. Conflicts will inevitably arise, with carbon emitters and workers taking shape when administrative legislation related to The Basic Law of Carbon Neutrality is embodied and related systems are implemented with systems. California's implementation of related administrative actions while ensuring the participation of industries and local residents in various democratic procedures in the process of implementing "AB32" could have implications for the challenge of securing social acceptance in the process of implementing NetZero.