한국 무역구제조치 분쟁의 법적 쟁점과 기업 및 정부에의 시사점- 최근 20년간의 주요 사례 -

This study conducts a case studies of the garlic dispute against China in 2000, the DRAM dispute against Japan in 2006, and the cold rolled steel sheet against United States in 2016, and deals with anti-dumping, countervailing duties, and safeguards, respectively. The recommendations were made at the government and business level to smoothly respond to the trade remedy dispute that will continue in the future. The implications obtained through case analysis in this study are as follows. First, Korean companies and government stakeholders need to raise awareness of trade remedy measures. Second, it is necessary to train professionals in companies. Third, an organic response system through information sharing is needed by establishing a cooperative system with related organizations and related companies. Fourth, it is necessary for the government to provide information on exporting companies. Fifth, domestic exporters need cost support to respond to trade relief measures of trading partners. Finally, it is necessary to establish an administrative system intra-company to respond to trade remedy measures.