사법적 판단의 오류에 관한 고찰 - 프랑스의 <칼라스 사건>과 <드레퓌스 사건>을 중심으로 -

The word 'error' does not exist in the Code of Criminal Procedure Act. However, there are errors of judicial judgment in the courts. The error occurs firstly when acquittal or acquittal of guilt, and secondarily occurs when the defendant is sentenced. Judges are humans too, so they are prone to making mistakes. As humans, such errors do not only exist in the judicial system, but in the world we live in, the more they directly affect our lives and lives, the more catastrophic they can sometimes be. The error of judicial judgment, that is, the coming of the court, is the first error to be wary of in that sense. This error will, of course, exist in every country in the world. This is because the world is not made up of only one thought, but countless prejudices and misconceptions intersect around us. In this article, we have considered some of the most famous cases of the errors of judicial judgment in the courts in history. We have examined the cause, process, and result of the <Calas Affair> in the 18th century and the <Dreyfus Affair> at the end of the 19th century in France, and the intellectuals who tried to realize justice, and their meaning. And as an alternative to prevent unfairness and injustice in judges, reinforcement of humanities education was suggested. It is necessary to create an environment in which humanities reading and discussion can take place continuously by increasing the proportion of humanities subjects compared to the current ones. The future of jurisprudence, past or present, depends on humanistic insights. Humanities are the foundation of law.