애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문약 학 회 지2022.06 발행KCI 피인용 3

공중보건 위기대응 의료제품의 개발 촉진 및 긴급 공급을 위한 특별법 고찰 및 FDA와 EMA의 유사 법안 비교 분석

Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response by Regulatory Authorities in South Korea, United States, and Europe

김선영(식품의약품안전처); 한연경(식품의약품안전처); 문은희(식품의약품안전청); 강석연(식품의약품안전처); 강원구(식품의약품안전처); 원정우(식품의약품안전처); 정시연(식품의약품안전처)

66권 3호, 125~139쪽

초록

Since the outbreak of the new strain of coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19) was first reported, regulatory authorities worldwide have issued various regulatory guidelines and recommendations. Global authorities are committed to supporting developers of potential vaccines and treatments for COVID-19. This study reviewed the guidelines and regulatory procedures instituted by authorities in the United States and Europe to understand the current perspectives of regulatory agencies worldwide and derive implications for public health emergency responses. The Act on Encouragement of Development and Emergency Circulation of Medical Countermeasures for public health emergencies enacted in 2021 established the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) to oversee policies for public health emergencies. In the US, the Public Law 113-5, the PHS Act, the PREP Act and the FD&C Act grant authorities emergency use power with respect to medical countermeasures needed during public health emergencies. The FDA can also facilitate the use of those medical countermeasures. The EMA has accelerated regulatory procedures in place for expediting the development and approval of medicinal products for COVID-19. The EMA’s rapid procedure includes rolling review, accelerated assessment and conditional marketing authorisation. Based on the review of foreign policies and practices regarding public health emergencies, this study showed that the Act on Encouragement of Development and Emergency Circulation of Medical Countermeasures for public health emergency responses has made important advances in public health emergency preparedness and response.

Abstract

Since the outbreak of the new strain of coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19) was first reported, regulatory authorities worldwide have issued various regulatory guidelines and recommendations. Global authorities are committed to supporting developers of potential vaccines and treatments for COVID-19. This study reviewed the guidelines and regulatory procedures instituted by authorities in the United States and Europe to understand the current perspectives of regulatory agencies worldwide and derive implications for public health emergency responses. The Act on Encouragement of Development and Emergency Circulation of Medical Countermeasures for public health emergencies enacted in 2021 established the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) to oversee policies for public health emergencies. In the US, the Public Law 113-5, the PHS Act, the PREP Act and the FD&C Act grant authorities emergency use power with respect to medical countermeasures needed during public health emergencies. The FDA can also facilitate the use of those medical countermeasures. The EMA has accelerated regulatory procedures in place for expediting the development and approval of medicinal products for COVID-19. The EMA’s rapid procedure includes rolling review, accelerated assessment and conditional marketing authorisation. Based on the review of foreign policies and practices regarding public health emergencies, this study showed that the Act on Encouragement of Development and Emergency Circulation of Medical Countermeasures for public health emergency responses has made important advances in public health emergency preparedness and response.

발행기관:
대한약학회
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.17480/psk.2022.66.3.125
분류:
약학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
공중보건 위기대응 의료제품의 개발 촉진 및 긴급 공급을 위한 특별법 고찰 및 FDA와 EMA의 유사 법안 비교 분석 | 약 학 회 지 2022 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI